Re: [PATCH 006 of 6] md: Add support for reshape of a raid6
From: Neil Brown <hidden>
Date: 2007-02-22 02:40:45
Also in:
lkml
On Wednesday February 21, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:35:16 +1100 NeilBrown [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
+ for (i = conf->raid_disks ; i-- ; ) {That statement should be dragged out, shot, stomped on then ceremonially incinerated.
An experiment in lateral thinking? I liked it, but there is no accounting for taste.
What's wrong with doing
for (i = 0; i < conf->raid_disks; i++) {
in a manner which can be understood without alcoholic fortification?I guess... "Egoless programmer" and all that, "write for others to read, not for the compiler", and as you say it comes to the same number of bytes of code on common architectures.
ho hum.
I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. I must right code that Andrew can read. NeilBrown