Re: Doubts about array size
From: Bruno Costacurta <hidden>
Date: 2006-10-18 04:34:18
On Wednesday 18 October 2006 00:19, Forrest Taylor wrote:
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 22:21 +0200, Bruno Costacurta wrote:quoted
Hello, I built my first RAID with 2 disks. Array looks active (please see hereafter) but I'm confusing about size : having 2 disks of 160-Gb each I expect a size of 160-Gb (correct ?) but array size seems around 103-Gb.Your array is not 103-Gb, but 103-Mb.quoted
Disk /dev/md0: 106 MB, 106823680 bytes 2 heads, 4 sectors/track, 26080 cylinders Units = cylinders of 8 * 512 = 4096 bytes 'mdadm --detail /dev/md0' : -start- /dev/md0: Version : 00.90.03 Creation Time : Tue Oct 17 21:26:43 2006 Raid Level : raid1 Array Size : 104320 (101.89 MiB 106.82 MB) Device Size : 104320 (101.89 MiB 106.82 MB)What did you do to create the device? Did you change the disks recently, or add new disks? You could try to grow the RAID (mdadm -G /dev/md0 -z max), but I would be wary of doing that until I knew why the disks showed the small size. Forrest
Hello,
looks better now...
It seems my previous fdisk commands to set type 'Linux raid autodetect' were
incorrect because not completely removed previous partitions.
Size looks correct.
...
mdadm --misc --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Version : 00.90.03
Creation Time : Tue Oct 17 23:24:25 2006
Raid Level : raid1
Array Size : 154304192 (147.16 GiB 158.01 GB)
Device Size : 154304192 (147.16 GiB 158.01 GB)
Raid Devices : 2
Total Devices : 2
Preferred Minor : 0
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Wed Oct 18 06:20:20 2006
State : clean
Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 2
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
UUID : c27fb118:876d28b2:47dd7e83:d14c4332
Events : 0.12
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 17 0 active sync /dev/sdb1
1 8 33 1 active sync /dev/sdc1
...
Bye,
Bruno