Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 10 authors, 2006-06-28

Re: Ok to go ahead with this setup?

From: Molle Bestefich <hidden>
Date: 2006-06-22 22:11:11

Christian Pernegger wrote:
Anything specific wrong with the Maxtors?
No.  I've used Maxtor for a long time and I'm generally happy with them.

They break now and then, but their online warranty system is great.
I've also been treated kindly by their help desk - talked to a cute
gal from Maxtor in Ireland over the phone just yesterday ;-).

Then again, they've just been acquired by Seagate, or so, so things
may change for the worse, who knows.

I'd watch out regarding the Western Digital disks, apparently they
have a bad habit of turning themselves off when used in RAID mode, for
some reason:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.device-mapper.devel/1980/
I read somewhere that this could reduce rebuild time when a "disk"
(partition in this case) is kicked offline because of a timeout or
somesuch. Sounds a bit fishy, which is why I'm asking.
The bitmap code in MD is for fast rebuilding, if you need that.
The point of the whole exercise is that I don't want to be cut off
from my data, just because a part of the host (not the disks) died.
I don't see any large risks of that happening with the setup you've outlined.
And iSCSI sounds way too expensive. :)
I think a host adapter is around $100.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help