Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 9 authors, 2005-10-21

Re: Best way to achieve large, expandable, cheap storage?

From: Robin Bowes <hidden>
Date: 2005-10-20 11:41:17

Gregory Seidman said the following on 20/10/2005 12:19:
} PV:
} /dev/md1 - 4 x 40GB drives (RAID5 - 120GB total)
} /dev/md2 - 4 x 40GB drives (RAID5 - 120GB total)

You should at least read the following before using RAID5. You can agree or
disagree, but you should take the arguments into account:

http://www.miracleas.com/BAARF/RAID5_versus_RAID10.txt
This was just an example configuration. My current 1TB array is RAID5 with 1 hot spare but I'll most likely use RAID6 in production.

} Suppose I then add a new PV:
} /dev/md3 - 4 x 300GB drives (RAID5 - 900GB total)

You use pvcreate and vgextend to do so, incidentally.
Yes, thanks for the detail.
} When this finishes, big_vg will contain /dev/md2 + /dev/md3 (1020GB } total). /dev/md1 will be unused.

/dev/md1 will still be a part of big_vg, but it won't have any data from
any LVs on it. You will need to use vgreduce to remove /dev/md1 from the
VG:

# vgreduce big_vg /dev/md1
Ah, yes, forgot about that step.

Thanks for the validation of the methodology.

I'm going to give this a try on my test server (using much smaller disks!)

Thanks again,

R.
-- 
http://robinbowes.com

If a man speaks in a forest,
and his wife's not there,
is he still wrong?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help