Re: Good, recent FS comparison?

Al Boldi wrote:

Jamie Lokier wrote:

quoted

Al Boldi wrote:

quoted

ext3 is rock-solid!

If only.  Recently I had a system come up after a power cycle with a
directory where reading any file in that directory gives an I/O error.
The disk is fine, and it's using ext3 in ordered mode, with IDE
write-caching disabled to be sure.

2.4 or 2.6?

In 2.4 try a reboot and force an fsck before mounting.

2.4.26, uclinux - it's an embedded device.

Doing an fsck before mounting would be an unacceptable boot-time delay.

Why do you suggest that, specifically for 2.4?  Is there a known
problem with 2.4 and ext3?

Thanks,
-- Jamie