Re: Where is the performance bottleneck?
From: Holger Kiehl <hidden>
Date: 2005-08-31 21:58:06
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Nick Piggin wrote:
Holger Kiehl wrote:quoted
meminfo.dump: MemTotal: 8124172 kB MemFree: 23564 kB Buffers: 7825944 kB Cached: 19216 kB SwapCached: 0 kB Active: 25708 kB Inactive: 7835548 kB HighTotal: 0 kB HighFree: 0 kB LowTotal: 8124172 kB LowFree: 23564 kB SwapTotal: 15631160 kB SwapFree: 15631160 kB Dirty: 3145604 kBHmm OK, dirty memory is pinned pretty much exactly on dirty_ratio so maybe I've just led you on a goose chase. You could echo 5 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio echo 10 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio To further reduce dirty memory in the system, however this is a long shot, so please continue your interaction with the other people in the thread first.
Yes, this does make a difference, here the results of running dd if=/dev/full of=/dev/sd?1 bs=4M count=4883 on 8 disks at the same time: 34.273340 33.938829 33.598469 32.970575 32.841351 32.723988 31.559880 29.778112 That's 32.710568 MB/s on average per disk with your change and without it it was 24.958557 MB/s on average per disk. I will do more tests tomorrow. Thanks, Holger