RE: Software RAID 0+1 with mdadm.
From: Brad Dameron <hidden>
Date: 2005-01-27 17:02:55
By the way the patches did not fix my boot issue with the RAID 1+0. I am using SuSe 9.2 if this helps. I've had to add in a few extra lines into my boot.local to get it show up at boot. Brad Dameron SeaTab Software www.seatab.com On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 14:14, J. Ryan Earl wrote:
This bug that's fixed in 1.9.0, is in a bug when you create the array? ie do we need to use 1.9.0 to create the array. I'm looking to do the same but my bootdisk currently only has 1.7.soemthing on it. Do I need to make a custom bootcd with 1.9.0 on it? Thanks, -ryan -----Original Message----- From: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org]On Behalf Of Luca Berra Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 9:17 AM To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Software RAID 0+1 with mdadm. On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 02:28:21PM -0800, Brad Dameron wrote:quoted
Everything seems ok after boot. But again no /dev/md0 in /proc/mdstat. But then if I do a mdadm --assemble --scan it will then load /dev/md0.there is a bug in mdadm, see my mail "patches for mdadm 1.8.0" or wait for 1.9.0 L. -- Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it Communication Media & Services S.r.l. /"\ \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN X AGAINST HTML MAIL / \ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html