Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2004-09-15

Re: Fw: Raid1 questions (devel)

From: Neil Brown <hidden>
Date: 2004-09-15 22:49:16

On Thursday September 16, alexcos@nights.ro wrote:
quoted
quoted
Hello..

I'm not sure if you are still developing the raid1 module for linux
kernel , but I'll give a shot.
quoted
quoted
Checking the source code of linux.2.6.8.1 , in raid1.c , at line 411 I
found this:
quoted
quoted
    "Don't change to another disk for sequential reads"

Well , my question is this:

    If there is a sequential read , but there are other disks in the
array which are idle , isn't it a better way to read in chunks from all the
disks ?  I think the transfer rate will be much improved from reading from
more disks , rather the using only one  (altough is sequential read)
You may be right.

Why don't you try changing the code to do different things, and test
each variation and see what works the fastest for you.  If it is fast
for other people as well, your change will probably be accepted.

NeilBrown
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help