Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2004-07-07

Re: mdadm spare-group not working for me

From: Holger Kiehl <hidden>
Date: 2004-07-07 11:29:52

On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Neil Brown wrote:
On Wednesday July 7, Holger.Kiehl@dwd.de wrote:
quoted
Hello

I am using mdadm 1.5.0 (kernel is 2.6.7) and noticed that spare-groups do
not work for me in a raid 10 setup. Here my mdadm.conf:

DEVICE /dev/hda[23567] /dev/hde[23567]
DEVICE /dev/sd[abcdef]1
DEVICE /dev/md[23456]
ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=2 UUID=ae4df447:33c21025:00e04356:461073a0
ARRAY /dev/md1 level=raid1 num-devices=2 UUID=3d426966:8a378a74:d73267fb:9ec0589c
ARRAY /dev/md2 level=raid1 num-devices=2 UUID=4e592020:0cc3ca3a:b983668f:d1595d33
ARRAY /dev/md3 level=raid1 num-devices=6 UUID=91e415e1:ab17103b:48d20b4a:1201303c spare-group=afdz
ARRAY /dev/md4 level=raid1 num-devices=2 UUID=71a92656:a1ac42c3:34577f43:f85a26ff spare-group=afdz
ARRAY /dev/md5 level=raid1 num-devices=2 UUID=7e51c839:aa48864b:b50bd5a5:267a1f1c spare-group=afdz
ARRAY /dev/md6 level=raid0 num-devices=3 UUID=c404c58a:42aeef9c:36a67c8e:cd229e88
MAILADDR root

Additionally mdadm is started in monitor mode with the following command:

mdadm --monitor /dev/md0 /dev/md1 /dev/md2 /dev/md3 /dev/md4 /dev/md5
Run mdadm as
   mdadm --monitor --scan
instead.  Currently information in the config file is ignored if you
actually list arrays to monitor.  I acknowledge that that doesn't
really make sense and will look into changing it, but that is the
way it is at the moment.
I tried this first but had a configuration error in mdadm.conf that
for /dev/md3 num-devices was set to 2. But setting this to 6 and --scan
this works. Thanks for the quick help!

Is it possible to influence the order at which the spares are taken
from the group? Reason is that I have four spare partitions on two
ide disks (2 partitions on each disk). Removing a second disk I
noticed it picked the second partition from the same disk. The spares
where added in this order hde7 hda7 hde6 hda6, but mdadm picked hde7
and then hde6. Better would be hde then hda.

Thanks,
Holger
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help