Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2004-06-14

Re: 3 disk raid-5 without parity

From: Jurriaan <hidden>
Date: 2004-06-14 12:42:08

From: Neil Brown <redacted>
Date: Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 09:45:21PM +1000
On Monday June 14, thunder7@xs4all.nl wrote:
quoted
I am trying to convince my boss our new database-server wants raid-0+1,
not raid-5, and I got an idea while reading endless articles about
raid-5 being slow when writing and management not listening.
You want numbers, not abstract arguments.

Configure your server with raid5 and do some performance measurements
- preferably with your database suite.
Then reconfigure with raid 0+1 and test again.

Show the numbers to your boss.  You get to choose which numbers to
show :-)
yes - unfortunately, corporate IT gets to decide which hardware to test
on. Guess what? They just got a shiny new SAN with 140 Gb disks,
configured in raid-5. Not quite the raid-0+1 over 36 Gb disks I had in
mind :-(
Anyway, that was just an introduction - nu use regurgling that on the
list.
I hope to release a "raid10" module for 2.6 within a couple of weeks.
raid10 is basically a combination of raid1 and raid0 all in one module
with some interesting geometry possibilities.  This particular
geometry is one of the possibilities.
I'm looking forward to that!

Kind regards,
Jurriaan
-- 
Anyone can build a fast processor. The trick is to build a fast system.
	Seymour Cray
Debian (Unstable) GNU/Linux 2.6.7-rc2-mm2 2x6078 bogomips load 2.49
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help