Re: 3 disk raid-5 without parity
From: Jurriaan <hidden>
Date: 2004-06-14 12:42:08
From: Neil Brown <redacted> Date: Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 09:45:21PM +1000
On Monday June 14, thunder7@xs4all.nl wrote:quoted
I am trying to convince my boss our new database-server wants raid-0+1, not raid-5, and I got an idea while reading endless articles about raid-5 being slow when writing and management not listening.You want numbers, not abstract arguments. Configure your server with raid5 and do some performance measurements - preferably with your database suite. Then reconfigure with raid 0+1 and test again. Show the numbers to your boss. You get to choose which numbers to show :-)
yes - unfortunately, corporate IT gets to decide which hardware to test on. Guess what? They just got a shiny new SAN with 140 Gb disks, configured in raid-5. Not quite the raid-0+1 over 36 Gb disks I had in mind :-( Anyway, that was just an introduction - nu use regurgling that on the list.
I hope to release a "raid10" module for 2.6 within a couple of weeks. raid10 is basically a combination of raid1 and raid0 all in one module with some interesting geometry possibilities. This particular geometry is one of the possibilities.
I'm looking forward to that! Kind regards, Jurriaan -- Anyone can build a fast processor. The trick is to build a fast system. Seymour Cray Debian (Unstable) GNU/Linux 2.6.7-rc2-mm2 2x6078 bogomips load 2.49