Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 5 authors, 2004-04-15

Re: Sanity check installation scheme

From: Jeff Woods <hidden>
Date: 2004-04-15 00:12:51

At 4/15/2004 12:37 AM +0100, robin-lists@robinbowes.com wrote:
Partition | sda          | sdb          | sdc      | sdd      |
----------+--------------+--------------+----------+----------+
        1 | RAID-1       | RAID-1       | swap     | swap     |
          | (/boot, 80M) | (/boot, 80M) | (180M)   | (180M)   |
          +--------------+--------------+----------+----------+
        2 | RAID-1       | RAID-1       | RAID-5   | RAID-5   |
          | (/, 100M)    | (/, 100M)    | (~4G)    | (~4G)    |
          +--------------+--------------+----------+----------+
        3 | RAID-5       | RAID-5       |
          | (~4G)        | (~4G)        |
          +--------------+--------------+

This will give me the following partitions:

/     100MB, mirrored
/boot 80MB, mirrored
/usr, /var, et. All on ~12G RAID-5 array.

Does this look feasible? Can you see any major gotchas? Any better
suggestions?
How about:

Partition | sda          | sdb          | sdc      | sdd      |
----------+--------------+--------------+----------+----------+
         1 | RAID-1       | RAID-1       | swap     | swap     |
           | (/boot, 80M) | (/boot, 80M) | (130M)   | (130M)   |
           +--------------+--------------+          |          |
         2 | swap         | swap         |          |          |
           | (50M)        | (50M)        |          |          |
           +--------------+--------------+----------+----------+
         3 | RAID-5       | RAID-5       | RAID-5   | RAID-5   |
           | (/, ~4G)     | (/, ~4G)     | (/, ~4G) | (/, ~4G) |
           +--------------+--------------+----------+----------+

This will give me the following partitions:

/boot 80MB, mirrored
/, /usr, /var, et. All on ~12G RAID-5 array.
360M swap spread across all 4 spindles

Adjust the capacities to suit.

Alternatively, use the other two spindles "next to" the /boot RAID-1 
partitions to provide a RAID-1 or RAID-0 /tmp filesystem.  However, I'd be 
inclined to increase the swap area and use tmpfs (which is virtual-memory 
based; i.e. RAM+swap) for /tmp.
--
Jeff Woods [off-list ref] 

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help