Re: [PATCH] klibc update

Jeff Garzik [off-list ref] wrote:

 >>Note that it isn't my intention to become klibc maintainer...  just in 
 >>case anybody started getting ideas... :)
 > 
 > 
 > I thought hpa was the klibc maintainer, you're just offering a patch to
 > add it to the build :)

 Right...  I meant I am not going to become the maintainer of said 
 patch/BK tree :)

It would be rather handy if someone could maintain the definitive tree for
this work for a while, until we linusify it.

I don't have a feeling for its stability/readiness/desirability/anthingelse
at this stage.  How mergeable is it?