Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2003-04-02

Re: Raid1 and mdadm

From: Paul Clements <hidden>
Date: 2003-04-02 20:22:58

Hi Neil,
No.  I would not accept patches.
Not because I fundamentally disagree with autostart, but because it
wouldn't work.  I suggest you try it.
Maybe I didn't explain very clearly what my goal is...allow me to
clarify:

As it is now, if you compile md as a module and happen to have a
partition tagged as RAID, you'll panic the kernel. There's code in
fs/partitions (and in 2.5, in init/do_mounts.c) that is calling into
md....yechhh. What I'd like to do is make a clean separation between the
boot up and partitioning code and the md driver, so md can be compiled
as a module. (This would also allow other volume managers to use the
partition tagging to identify devices, if they wanted.) 

quoted
Or is there a better way to do this?
Yes.
initrd/initfs is "the right way".
As far as I know, it *does* work.(*)  You do not need md linked into the
kernel.
You have md.o and whatever personalities you want in the initrd image,
then in the initrd script (linuxrc I think) you load the modules, and
use mdadm to assemble the raid arrays.
You then mount the real root and off you go.
Right, sorry, I wasn't clear. This is basically what I meant. All I want
to do is allow autostart_arrays() to be called when md is compiled as a
module. Then, let the initrd/linuxrc (later initramfs) call
autostart_arrays() (ioctl("/dev/md0", RAID_AUTORUN) is all, really).

I've hacked on 2.5.63. I'll attach the patch, it's fairly short...and
might give you a better idea what I'm proposing...

Any comments would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Paul

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help