Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 5 authors, 2003-02-11

Re:2TB+ fs ext3 (was fsck out of memory)

From: Stephan van Hienen <hidden>
Date: 2003-02-11 20:23:16
Also in: lkml

On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
Ugh, that stuff is ancient.

Peter Chubb has a backport of his (very thorough) 2.5 patch to support
large block devices on 32-bit platforms, against much newer kernels
(e.g. 2.4.20) than Ben's stuff.  His site seems to be down, but you
should be able to get it from somewhere under
http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/~peterc/
correct link : http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/patches-index.html
(but down)

i used this patch, but i got this comment :
Well, that's the most likely candidate, because it's the least tested
component.  Are you using Ben LaHaise's LBD fixes for the md devices?
Without those, md and lvm are not LBD-safe.
makes me wonder if i need another patch besides the 'Peter Chubb patch'
when using md raid ?
I haven't used Peter's patch, but a similar patch, developed
independently, definitely allows ext3 filesystems of up to 8TB in size
to work fine on x86, under 2.4.
look at my other posts, i can't create/work with a 2348 Gigabyte /dev/md0


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help