Re:2TB+ fs ext3 (was fsck out of memory)
From: Stephan van Hienen <hidden>
Date: 2003-02-11 20:23:16
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
Ugh, that stuff is ancient. Peter Chubb has a backport of his (very thorough) 2.5 patch to support large block devices on 32-bit platforms, against much newer kernels (e.g. 2.4.20) than Ben's stuff. His site seems to be down, but you should be able to get it from somewhere under http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/~peterc/
correct link : http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/patches-index.html (but down) i used this patch, but i got this comment :
Well, that's the most likely candidate, because it's the least tested component. Are you using Ben LaHaise's LBD fixes for the md devices? Without those, md and lvm are not LBD-safe.
makes me wonder if i need another patch besides the 'Peter Chubb patch' when using md raid ?
I haven't used Peter's patch, but a similar patch, developed independently, definitely allows ext3 filesystems of up to 8TB in size to work fine on x86, under 2.4.
look at my other posts, i can't create/work with a 2348 Gigabyte /dev/md0 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com