Re: Is Read speed faster when 1 disk is failed on raid5 ?
From: <hidden>
Date: 2002-10-17 11:52:44
did the same test with 4 disks in raid5
4 disks raid5 synced :
Version 1.02c ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
--Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block--
--Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP
/sec %CP
storagenew.a2000 1G 18654 99 64992 63 24127 25 23504 97 57140 17
480.7 2
------Sequential Create------ --------Random
Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read---
-Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
/sec %CP
16 1915 96 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ 2002 98 +++++ +++
5422 98
storagenew.a2000.nu,1G,18654,99,64992,63,24127,25,23504,97,57140,17,480.7,2,16,1915,96,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,2002,98,+++++,+++,5422,98
raid5 4disks, 1 failed :
Version 1.02c ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
--Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block--
--Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP
/sec %CP
storagenew.a2000 1G 18566 99 58434 57 27743 35 23089 98 119752 56
332.1 1
------Sequential Create------ --------Random
Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read---
-Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
/sec %CP
16 1942 97 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ 1978 99 +++++ +++
5585 99
storagenew.a2000.nu,1G,18566,99,58434,57,27743,35,23089,98,119752,56,332.1,1,16,1942,97,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,1978,99,+++++,+++,5585,99