Re: [PATCH] raid superblock sanity checking (validate_sb)
flat view
From: Troy Benjegerdes <hidden>
Date: 2002-08-17 17:38:48
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 10:03:05AM -0700, Cress, Andrew R wrote:
Neil, The problem is due to several md kernel bugs that corrupt the superblock. And, since my target environment is a raid1 root mirror, it's a bigger deal to reboot to a removable and manually fix it from userspace with mdadm.
With the corruption I encountered, the kernel would panic on autodetecting the raid, since the superblock on disk got corrupted. Yes, the original cause should be fixed, but IMHO, the kernel should never dereference a bogus pointer because of corrupt data on the superblock. Spit out a big fat warning, and maybe panic after that yes.
It's a can of worms, but you are right, the right approach is to fix all of the locations where a blind increment or decrement of the values takes place, which I guess are the same locations where I put the validate_sb routine. I'll drill down further to try to fix the root problems. Andy -----Original Message----- From: Neil Brown [mailto:neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au] Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 9:43 PM To: Cress, Andrew R Cc: 'Troy Benjegerdes'; linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] raid superblock sanity checking (validate_sb) On Monday August 12, andrew.r.cress@intel.com wrote:quoted
I've written a patch to help this problem. [...] Neil, You've seen a lot of these type problems corrected with mdadm. Does this cover most of the cases?If there is a kernel bug that corrupts the superblock, then we should fix the bug, not put in lots of validation to see if the bug has hit.. And if a superblock did get corrupted, then fixing it is a userspace (mdadm) issue, not kernel. Or maybe I'm not understanding what problem you are trying to solve. NeilBrown
-- Troy Benjegerdes | master of mispeeling | 'da hozer' | hozer@drgw.net -----"If this message isn't misspelled, I didn't write it" -- Me ----- "Why do musicians compose symphonies and poets write poems? They do it because life wouldn't have any meaning for them if they didn't. That's why I draw cartoons. It's my life." -- Charles Schulz