Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2002-05-31

Re: mdadm mail option configuration

From: Jakob Østergaard <hidden>
Date: 2002-05-31 14:09:37

On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 09:10:41AM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
On Wednesday May 29, danci@agenda.si wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Neil Brown wrote:
quoted
quoted
Then, I just have an init script that runs:

	/sbin/mdadm -Fs --delay=600 &
Why 600 (10 minutes)?? I would suggest 60seconds for normal operation
and 1 second for testing.
I've tried this and maybe I'm missing something. I've set a 5 second
interval for checking and I only got one mail - notifiyng me about
a failure.
Yes, that's right.  One failure, one email.  I'm not in the business
of spam.
What we do with SysOrb (blatant plug: http://sysorb.com) is to send out an
e-mail immediately when the RAID degrades, and then a new mail every N seconds.
The RAID may be checked every 10 seconds, and the user may configure N to be,
say, 1800 seconds.  So the failure is detected almost immediately, while the
alert will only be sent every half hour for example.

We've found that this repetition is useful as a reminder.   It also motivates
people to either fix the problem, or schedule downtime for the check saying
that it will be down for another 24 hours for example.

Once you are administering more than a few machines, one alert can get lost in
the occational heap.

...
It has occurred to me that it could be useful to send mail at startup
if there appear to be any abnormalities, but I think I would prefer
that sort of functionality to be external.  A sysdamin might want that
mail are reboot, or every night, or every week, or never.  A simple:
  grep -s > /dev/nu $magic_pattern /proc/mdstat && 
       mail -s "Raid problem on `hostname`" root << END
	    Possible RAID problem, please check.
	    `hostname`
	    `cat /proc/mdstat
	    END

is all that is needed.
In general, I think that these small scripts are really nice and all, if that
is "good enough" for you.   Once they are no longer good enough, start looking
into real monitoring systems.

NetSaint could be hacked into supporting RAID I'm sure.   And if you want to
save the hackery and can accept a commercial solution, well, then I plugged one
just above  ;)

-- 
................................................................
:   jakob@unthought.net   : And I see the elder races,         :
:.........................: putrid forms of man                :
:   Jakob Østergaard      : See him rise and claim the earth,  :
:        OZ9ABN           : his downfall is at hand.           :
:.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help