Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 3 authors, 2021-12-01

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] cpufreq: Fix a comment in cpufreq_policy_free

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2021-12-01 07:19:41
Also in: lkml

On 01-12-21, 15:40, Tang Yizhou wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Make the comment of blocking_notifier_call_chain() easier to
understand.

Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <redacted>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index e338d2f010fe..db0b4b4258d5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1296,8 +1296,9 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 
 	if (policy->max_freq_req) {
 		/*
-		 * CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification is sent only after
-		 * successfully adding max_freq_req request.
+		 * Remove max_freq_req after sending CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY
+		 * notification, since CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification was
+		 * sent after adding max_freq_req earlier.
 		 */
 		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
 					     CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY, policy);
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help