Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Fix a comment in cpufreq_policy_free
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2021-12-01 04:22:53
Also in:
lkml
On 30-11-21, 23:15, Tang Yizhou wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
The comment is inconsistent with the block_notifier_call_chain() call, so fix it. Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <redacted> --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index e338d2f010fe..8f753675e4a2 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c@@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) if (policy->max_freq_req) { /* - * CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification is sent only after + * CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY notification is sent only after
No, the earlier comment is correct. It says when the CREATE notification was sent and so we need to do the remove here before removing max_freq_req.
* successfully adding max_freq_req request. */ blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list, -- 2.17.1
-- viresh