[PATCH 0/3] PM: domains: Improvements for performance states in genpd · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2021-09-02
[PATCH 1/3] PM: domains: Drop the performance state vote for a device at detach · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2021-09-02
Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: domains: Drop the performance state vote for a device at detach · Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> · 2021-09-03
Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: domains: Drop the performance state vote for a device at detach · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2021-09-03
Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: domains: Drop the performance state vote for a device at detach · Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> · 2021-09-03
Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: domains: Drop the performance state vote for a device at detach · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2021-09-03
Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: domains: Drop the performance state vote for a device at detach · Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> · 2021-09-05
Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: domains: Drop the performance state vote for a device at detach · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2021-09-06
Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: domains: Drop the performance state vote for a device at detach · Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> · 2021-09-06
Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: domains: Drop the performance state vote for a device at detach · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2021-09-06
Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: domains: Drop the performance state vote for a device at detach · Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> · 2021-09-06
Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: domains: Drop the performance state vote for a device at detach · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2021-09-07
Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: domains: Drop the performance state vote for a device at detach · Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> · 2021-09-09
Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: domains: Drop the performance state vote for a device at detach · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2021-09-09
[PATCH 2/3] PM: domains: Restructure some code in __genpd_dev_pm_attach() · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2021-09-02
[PATCH 3/3] PM: domains: Add a ->dev_get_performance_state() callback to genpd · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2021-09-02
Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM: domains: Add a ->dev_get_performance_state() callback to genpd · Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> · 2021-09-03
Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM: domains: Add a ->dev_get_performance_state() callback to genpd · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2021-09-03
Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM: domains: Add a ->dev_get_performance_state() callback to genpd · Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> · 2021-09-03
Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM: domains: Add a ->dev_get_performance_state() callback to genpd · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2021-09-03
Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM: domains: Add a ->dev_get_performance_state() callback to genpd · Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> · 2021-09-05
Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM: domains: Add a ->dev_get_performance_state() callback to genpd · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2021-09-06
Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM: domains: Add a ->dev_get_performance_state() callback to genpd · Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> · 2021-09-06
Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM: domains: Add a ->dev_get_performance_state() callback to genpd · Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> · 2021-09-07
Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM: domains: Add a ->dev_get_performance_state() callback to genpd · Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> · 2021-09-07
Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM: domains: Add a ->dev_get_performance_state() callback to genpd · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2021-09-07
Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM: domains: Add a ->dev_get_performance_state() callback to genpd · Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> · 2021-09-09
Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM: domains: Add a ->dev_get_performance_state() callback to genpd · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2021-09-09
Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM: domains: Add a ->dev_get_performance_state() callback to genpd · Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> · 2021-09-10

Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM: domains: Add a ->dev_get_performance_state() callback to genpd

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2021-09-07 03:40:50
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, lkml

On 06-09-21, 17:35, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:

Viresh, are you okay with going back to the variant with the
dev_pm_opp_sync() helper?

I have missed a lot of stuff in between and wasn't following this
carefully as I thought my half was resolved :)

Can you describe what to propose to do again ? From what I remember,
doing this one time from probe() is okay, doing it from
suspend/resume, not so much.

-- 
viresh

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help