Re: [PATCH] PM: sleep: core: Avoid setting power.must_resume to false
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2021-08-06 15:16:33
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 08:07:08AM -0700, psodagud@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2021-08-03 10:16, Greg KH wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 08:24:34AM -0700, Prasad Sodagudi wrote:quoted
There are variables(power.may_skip_resume and dev->power.must_resume) and DPM_FLAG_MAY_SKIP_RESUME flags to control the resume of devices after a system wide suspend transition. Setting the DPM_FLAG_MAY_SKIP_RESUME flag means that the driver allows its "noirq" and "early" resume callbacks to be skipped if the device can be left in suspend after a system-wide transition into the working state. PM core determines that the driver's "noirq" and "early" resume callbacks should be skipped or not with dev_pm_skip_resume() function by checking power.may_skip_resume variable. power.must_resume variable is getting set to false in __device_suspend() function without checking device's DPM_FLAG_MAY_SKIP_RESUME and dev->power.usage_count variables. This is leading to failure to call resume handler for some of the devices suspended in early suspend phase. So check device's DPM_FLAG_MAY_SKIP_RESUME flag before setting power.must_resume variable. Signed-off-by: Prasad Sodagudi <redacted> --- drivers/base/power/main.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c index d568772..8eebc4d 100644 --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c@@ -1642,7 +1642,11 @@ static int __device_suspend(struct device*dev, pm_message_t state, bool async) } dev->power.may_skip_resume = true; - dev->power.must_resume = false; + if ((atomic_read(&dev->power.usage_count) <= 1) && + (dev_pm_test_driver_flags(dev, DPM_FLAG_MAY_SKIP_RESUME)))What is preventing that atomic value from changing _right_ after you just read this? and very odd indentation, checkpatch didn't complain about this?Sure. I will fix indentation problem once Rafael reviewed this patch.
Neither of us can take this as-is, so why wait?