Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] mfd: tps65086: Make interrupt line optional
From: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>
Date: 2021-07-15 11:27:43
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 at 13:13, Lee Jones [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jul 2021, Rob Herring wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:18:01AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:quoted
On Sat, 26 Jun 2021, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:quoted
The BeagleV Starlight v0.9 board[1] doesn't have the IRQB line routed to the SoC, but it is still useful to be able to reach the PMIC over I2CWhat is still useful? The GPIO and Regulator drivers?quoted
for the other functionality it provides. [1] https://github.com/beagleboard/beaglev-starlight Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk> --- .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps65086.yaml | 3 --- drivers/mfd/tps65086.c | 21 ++++++++++--------- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps65086.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps65086.yaml index ba638bd10a58..4b629fcc0df9 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps65086.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps65086.yaml@@ -87,9 +87,6 @@ additionalProperties: false required: - compatible - reg - - interrupts - - interrupt-controller - - '#interrupt-cells'I can't say that I've been keeping up with the latest DT binding changes, but shouldn't these lines be relocated into some kind of optional listing? Or are optional properties omitted from documentation?Optional properties are the ones not listed in the 'required' list.Ah, so they are already documented somewhere else in the file?
Yes, just a few lines above.