On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:17:43AM +0530, skakit@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2021-05-10 21:54, Rob Herring wrote:
quoted
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 09:01:39AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 10 May 2021 12:31:03 +0530, satya priya wrote:
quoted
Convert qcom pm8941 power key binding from .txt to .yaml format.
Signed-off-by: satya priya <redacted>
---
Changes in V2:
- Fixed bot errors, took reference from input.yaml for "linux,code"
- Added one complete example for powerkey and resin, and referenced it
in main PON binding.
- Moved this patch to the end of the series.
Changes in V3:
- Moved this patch before PON binding patch.
- As per Rob's comments, added allOf at the beginning of binding.
Added maxItems for interrupts.
- Added 'unevaluatedProperties' instead of 'additionalProperties' as
we are using allOf.
.../bindings/input/qcom,pm8941-pwrkey.txt | 55 --------------
.../bindings/input/qcom,pm8941-pwrkey.yaml | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8941-pwrkey.txt
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8941-pwrkey.yaml
My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m
dt_binding_check'
on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
yamllint warnings/errors:
dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8941-pwrkey.example.dt.yaml:0:0:
/example-0/spmi@c440000/pmic@0/pon_hlos@1300: failed to match any
schema with compatible: ['qcom,pm8998-pon']
You have the same example in patch 5, so drop the example here. That
will fix this circular dependency.
Earlier I have dropped example from qcom-pon.yaml. Now, I will add the
example there and drop here.
It sounds to me you want to combine patches 4 and 5 since they depend on
each other.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry