On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:32 PM Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:

On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 4:08 PM Syed Nayyar Waris [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

+       bitmap_set_value(old, 64, state[0], 32, 0);
+       bitmap_set_value(old, 64, state[1], 32, 32);

Isn't it effectively bitnap_from_arr32() ?

quoted

+       bitmap_set_value(new, 64, state[0], 32, 0);
+       bitmap_set_value(new, 64, state[1], 32, 32);

Ditto.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Hi Andy,

With bitmap_set_value() we are also specifying the offset (or start)
position too. so that the remainder of the array remains unaffected. I
think it would not be feasible to use bitmap_from/to_arr32()  here.

Regards
Syed Nayyar Waris