Re: [PATCH] opp: Don't ignore clk_get() errors other than -ENODEV
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-01-29 19:27:06
Also in:
lkml
29.01.2021 20:46, Viresh Kumar пишет:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On 29-01-21, 18:23, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:quoted
29.01.2021 13:51, Viresh Kumar пишет:quoted
Not all devices that need to use OPP core need to have clocks, a missing clock is fine in which case -ENODEV shall be returned by clk_get(). Anything else is an error and must be handled properly. Reported-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- Stephen, is the understanding correct that -ENODEV is the only error returned for missing clocks ? Dmitry: I hope this is on the lines of what you were looking for ?Viresh, thank you! This is not what I was looking for because clk core doesn't return -ENODEV for a missing clock, but -ENOENT. The ENODEV certainly should break drivers.My bad.quoted
I was looking for this:diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c index 0305861fee1b..3dd9cdbc0e75 100644 --- a/drivers/opp/core.c +++ b/drivers/opp/core.c@@ -1264,7 +1264,7 @@ static struct opp_table*_update_opp_table_clk(struct device *dev, if (IS_ERR(opp_table->clk)) { int ret = PTR_ERR(opp_table->clk); - if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) { + if (ret != -ENOENT) { dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(opp_table); return ERR_PTR(ret); }You should be looking for this instead, isn't it ?diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c index 049d45e70807..4bfcbe5b57af 100644 --- a/drivers/opp/core.c +++ b/drivers/opp/core.c@@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ static struct opp_table *_update_opp_table_clk(struct device *dev, if (!ret) return opp_table; - if (ret == -ENODEV) { + if (ret == -ENOENT) { dev_dbg(dev, "%s: Couldn't find clock: %d\n", __func__, ret); return opp_table; }
This will work too. Then also could be better to replace the "if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)" with dev_err_probe(..).