Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] New thermal interface allowing IPA to get max power

[RFC][PATCH 0/3] New thermal interface allowing IPA to get max power · Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> · 2021-01-26
[RFC][PATCH 2/3] thermal: devfreq_cooling: add new callback to get user limit for min state · Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> · 2021-01-26
[RFC][PATCH 3/3] thermal: power_allocator: get proper max power limited by user · Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> · 2021-01-26
[RFC][PATCH 1/3] PM /devfreq: add user frequency limits into devfreq struct · Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> · 2021-01-26
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] PM /devfreq: add user frequency limits into devfreq struct · Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> · 2021-02-03
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] PM /devfreq: add user frequency limits into devfreq struct · Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> · 2021-02-03
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] PM /devfreq: add user frequency limits into devfreq struct · Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> · 2021-02-11
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] PM /devfreq: add user frequency limits into devfreq struct · Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> · 2021-02-11
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] PM /devfreq: add user frequency limits into devfreq struct · Chanwoo Choi <hidden> · 2021-02-15
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] PM /devfreq: add user frequency limits into devfreq struct · Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> · 2021-02-16
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] PM /devfreq: add user frequency limits into devfreq struct · Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> · 2021-02-24
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] New thermal interface allowing IPA to get max power · Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> · 2021-01-27
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] New thermal interface allowing IPA to get max power · Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> · 2021-01-27
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] New thermal interface allowing IPA to get max power · Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> · 2021-01-27
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] New thermal interface allowing IPA to get max power · Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> · 2021-02-01
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] New thermal interface allowing IPA to get max power · Daniel Lezcano <hidden> · 2021-02-01
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] New thermal interface allowing IPA to get max power · Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> · 2021-02-01
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] New thermal interface allowing IPA to get max power · Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> · 2021-02-02
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] New thermal interface allowing IPA to get max power · Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> · 2021-02-02
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] New thermal interface allowing IPA to get max power · "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> · 2021-02-01
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] New thermal interface allowing IPA to get max power · Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> · 2021-02-01
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] New thermal interface allowing IPA to get max power · Daniel Lezcano <hidden> · 2021-02-22
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] New thermal interface allowing IPA to get max power · Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> · 2021-02-22

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2021-01-27 09:19:33
Also in: lkml

On 26-01-21, 10:39, Lukasz Luba wrote:

As it's a RFC, it still misses the cpufreq sysfs implementation, but would
be addressed if all agree.

Not commenting on the whole stuff but if you ever need something for cpufreq, it
is already there. Look for these.

store_one(scaling_min_freq, min);
store_one(scaling_max_freq, max);

Hopefully they will work just fine.

-- 
viresh

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help