Thread (25 messages) 25 messages, 6 authors, 2021-01-27

Re: [PATCH v3] PM / clk: make PM clock layer compatible with clocks that must sleep

From: Nicolas Pitre <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-25 18:26:54
Also in: linux-clk, lkml

On Mon, 25 Jan 2021, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 12:07 AM Nicolas Pitre [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
A note on sparse:
According to https://lwn.net/Articles/109066/ there are things
that sparse can't cope with. In particular, pm_clk_op_lock() and
pm_clk_op_unlock() may or may not lock/unlock psd->lock depending on
some runtime condition. To work around that we tell sparse the lock
is always untaken for the purpose of static analisys.
It looks like sparse is still complaining:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/600dc681.3mAl9WQXnragfNZk%25lkp@intel.com/ (local)
Would you happen to still have one of those randconfig configuration?

I'd like to know why sparse complains about 3 out of 93 configs.


Nicolas
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help