On 11/26/20 2:30 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:

On 26/11/2020 15:02, Lukasz Luba wrote:

[ ... ]

quoted

quoted

quoted

changed via sysfs.

Could you take it please? It should apply smoothly in your tree.

Actually, I'm waiting for Ionela and Dietmar ack.

Are they maintainers of this file that you need their ACKs?
Maybe I should drop mine then.

Ok let me clarify :)

In general when someone comments on the changes, I usually wait for the
consensus before merging the patches. If the persons who commented
before are unresponsive, depending on the context and my perception, I
apply the changes or not.

I'm giving the opportunity to Ionela to review the series again as she
commented the previous version (and gave a reviewed-by). I thought also
Dietmar commented the series but apparently I was wrong.

As you stated, you are the maintainer of the subsystem, so if there are
no acked-by or reviewed-by, the series will be applied anyway soon.

Meanwhile, they are in the 'testing' branch of the tree, the antechamber
of 'linux-next' and 'next' ;)

Thank you clarifying this and taking the patches into the testing
branch.

Regards,
Lukasz