Thread (30 messages) 30 messages, 6 authors, 2020-10-22

Re: [PATCH V2 4/8] mmc: sdhci-msm: Unconditionally call dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table()

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2020-08-31 10:45:12
Also in: linux-arm-msm, linux-mmc, lkml

On 28-08-20, 10:43, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 at 08:08, Viresh Kumar [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table() doesn't report any errors when it fails to
find the OPP table with error -ENODEV (i.e. OPP table not present for
the device). And we can call dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table()
unconditionally here.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Replaced v1 with v2 on my next branch, thanks!

Just to be sure, this patch doesn't depend on any changes for the opp
core that are queued for v5.10?
The recent crashes reported by Anders and Naresh were related to a OPP
core bug, for which I have just sent the fix here:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/922ff0759a16299e24cacfc981ac07914d8f1826.1598865786.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/ (local)

This is already tested by Naresh now and finally everything works as
expected.

I am going to get this fix merged in 5.9-rc4, but we do have a
dependency now with that fix.

What's the best way to handle this stuff now ? The easiest IMO would
be for me to send these patches through the OPP tree, otherwise people
need to carry this and the OPP fix (for which I can provide the
branch/tag).

-- 
viresh
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help