On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 04:08:11PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 15-10-18, 08:34, Jordan Crouse wrote:
quoted
I agree that consistency is good. But the GPU is by design outside of the
control of the genpd universe so it is by design not using the same features.
It unfortunately does happen to use a similar number in an OPP binding to
construct the level mapping but since we can't read the cmd-db from the GMU
space this is a necessary evil.
Where do you define how to use this binding in case of GPU? I mean
some DT binding doc must have some information to avoid confusion as
all other users will have the qcom,level thing in the genpd's OPP
table which GPU will have it directly within its OPP table.
When I first made the patch I was just using existing OPP bindings for GPU
levels as the wording was generic enough to cover both cases. I would be happy
to revisit that and indicate that the OPP bindings apply to RPMh and GPU/GMU
as we've discussed in this thread.
Jordan
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel