Re: [PATCH v9 00/11] PM / Domains: Support hierarchical CPU arrangement (PSCI/ARM) (a subset)

On Thursday, October 4, 2018 10:58:53 AM CEST Ulf Hansson wrote:

On 4 October 2018 at 10:39, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:39 PM Ulf Hansson [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

I have digested the review comments so far, including a recent offlist chat
with with Lorenzo Pieralisi around the debatable PSCI changes. More or less I
have a plan for how to move forward.

However, to avoid re-posting non-changed patches over and over again, I decided
to withhold the more debatable part from this v9, hence this is not the complete
series to make things play. In v9, I have just included the trivial changes,
which are either already acked/reviewed or hopefully can be rather soon/easily.

My hope is to get this queued for v4.20, to move things forward. I know it's
late, but there are more or less nothing new here since v8.

I have no problems with the first three patches in this series, so I
can apply them right away.  Do you want me to do that?

Yes, please.

quoted

As for the rest, the cpuidle driver patch looks OK to me, but the
PSCI-related ones need ACKs.

For some yes, but I think you can go ahead with a few more.

Patch 4, 5 is already acked/reviewed.

Patch 6 should be fine (if you are okay with it else wait for an ack
from Daniel)

OK, thanks.

Do the 4-6 depend on the 1-3?

Patch 7 and 8 should be fine. They were suggested by Mark.

I'd rather have ACKs on these two as well.

Patch 9 and 10 needs acks.

Patch 11 has been acked, but depends on the other PSCI changes.

OK