Hello,
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 03:05:17PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
I am using unbound workqueues. However there isn't an interface that
exposes the NUMA bits of them directly. All I am doing with this
patch is adding "queue_work_near" which takes a NUMA node as an
argument and then copies the logic of "queue_work_on" with the
exception that I am doing a check to verify that there is an
intersection between wq_unbound_cpumask and the cpumask of the node,
and then passing a CPU from that intersection into "__queue_work".
Can it just take a cpu id and not feed that to __queue_work()? That
looks like a lot of extra logic.
Thanks.
--
tejun