On 25/08/2018 01:24, Eduardo Valentin wrote:

On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 06:02:34PM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:

quoted

c(1) + x(1) was actually meant to be c(1) * x(1).

While we're at it, add some brackets to make it nicer to read.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <redacted>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt
index cc553f0952c5..751104213d08 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt

@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ Optional property:
   Elem size: one cell	the sensors listed in the thermal-sensors property.
   Elem type: signed	Coefficients defaults to 1, in case this property
 			is not specified. A simple linear polynomial is used:
-			Z = c0 * x0 + c1 + x1 + ... + c(n-1) * x(n-1) + cn.
+			Z = (c0 * x0) + (c1 * x1) + ... + (c(n-1) * x(n-1)) + cn.

To be honest, I would prefer if this looks like:
+			Z = c0 * x0 + c1 * x1 + ... + c(n-1) * x(n-1) + cn.

The extra bracketing seams unnecessary confusion

I agree, the brackets don't change the computation ordering, they are
pointless.


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog