Thread (18 messages) read the whole thread 18 messages, 5 authors, 2018-05-28

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Introduce QCOM CPUFREQ FW bindings

From: Taniya Das <hidden>
Date: 2018-05-28 07:30:04
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

Hello Rob,

Could you please suggest if the below looks okay to be implemented?

On 5/24/2018 11:13 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 24-05-18, 10:48, Taniya Das wrote:
quoted
Hello Rob, Viresh,

Thank you for the comments. If I understand correctly, the device tree nodes
should look something like the below.

Though I am not sure if any vendor name could be associated in the cpu
nodes.
Well Rob said Yes to that I think.
quoted
Please suggest if my understanding is wrong.

cpu@0 {
	qcom,freq-domain = <&freq_domain_table0>;
	…
};

same follows for cpu 1/2/3

cpu@400 {
	qcom,freq-domain = <&freq_domain_table1>;
	…
};
same follows for cpu 5/6/7

freq_domain_table0 : freq_table {
	reg = < >, < >, < > ;
	reg-names = "perf_base", "lut_base", "en_base";
};

freq_domain_table1 : freq_table {
	reg = < >, < >, < > ;
	reg-names = "perf_base", "lut_base", "en_base";
};
Mostly yes.
-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.

--
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help