Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: skip cpufreq resume if it's not suspended
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2018-02-05 09:06:02
Also in:
lkml
On 05-02-18, 09:50, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
By design (which I admit may be confusing) it should be fine to call dpm_resume_end() after a failing dpm_suspend_start(), whatever the reason for the failure is. cpufreq_suspend/resume() don't take that into account, everybody else does.
Hmm, I see. Can't do much then, just fix the only broken piece of code :) -- viresh