On 30/11/17 15:54, Patrick Bellasi wrote:

On 30-Nov 14:36, Juri Lelli wrote:

[...]

quoted

I wonder if we would also need some way to trigger a back to back update
as soon as a currently running one finishes and an RT/DL task asked for
an update (without waiting for the next tick).

Good point, I think that would actually be an interesting
optimization. We already discussed that in the past, but refrained by
adding more on top of this already "substantial" set of changes.

Can we think about that once we decided about some patches of this
series?

Definitely yes for me. One bit at a time. :)

Best,

Juri