Re: [PATCH 3/3] power: supply: Add support MAX1721x battery monitor
From: Sebastian Reichel <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-08 19:17:37
Also in:
lkml
Hi Alex, On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 08:44:35PM +0300, Alex A. Mihaylov wrote:
08.06.17 15:48, Sebastian Reichel wrote:quoted
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 10:06:29AM +0300, Alex A. Mihaylov wrote:quoted
diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/max1721x_battery.c b/drivers/power/supply/max1721x_battery.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..aa0effec3d --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/power/supply/max1721x_battery.c@@ -0,0 +1,357 @@ +/* + * 1-wire client/driver for the Maxim Semicondactor + * MAX17211/MAX17215 Standalone Fuel Gauge IC + * + * Copyright (C) 2017 OAO Radioavionica + * Author: Alex A. Mihaylov <minimumlaw@rambler.ru> + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as + * published by the Free Software Foundation. + * + */ + +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/param.h>param?Ok, sorry. This really not need. I remove this in next revision.quoted
quoted
+#include <linux/pm.h> +#include <linux/regmap.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/power_supply.h> +#include <linux/idr.h> + +#include "../../w1/w1.h"This will conflict with public w1 interface patch https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2524566.html This patch should be on top of that patch.Ok. No problem. I can fix this here. I can fix this in regmap-w1. Just tell me which of the patches will be applied first. If the one to which you refer, I will resend the patches immediately after it appears at least in -rc.quoted
quoted
+#include "../../w1/slaves/w1_max1721x.h"Let's merge those defines into the driver. They are not used anywhere else.Theory, Maxim integrated have MAX17201/MAX17205 with I2C interface. This may required for feature i2c driver.
This would end up in the same driver with only probe function being different.
quoted
quoted
+ +/* Model Gauge M5 Register Memory Map access */ +static const struct regmap_range max1721x_regs_allow[] = { + /* M5 Model Gauge Algorithm area */ + regmap_reg_range(0x00, 0x23), + regmap_reg_range(0x27, 0x2F), + regmap_reg_range(0x32, 0x32), + regmap_reg_range(0x35, 0x36), + regmap_reg_range(0x38, 0x3A), + regmap_reg_range(0x3D, 0x3F), + regmap_reg_range(0x42, 0x42), + regmap_reg_range(0x45, 0x46), + regmap_reg_range(0x4A, 0x4A), + regmap_reg_range(0x4D, 0x4D), + regmap_reg_range(0xB0, 0xB0), + regmap_reg_range(0xB4, 0xB4), + regmap_reg_range(0xB8, 0xBE), + regmap_reg_range(0xD1, 0xDA), + regmap_reg_range(0xDC, 0xDF), + /* Factory settins area */ + regmap_reg_range(0x180, 0x1DF), + { } +}; + +static const struct regmap_range max1721x_regs_deny[] = { + regmap_reg_range(0x24, 0x26), + regmap_reg_range(0x30, 0x31), + regmap_reg_range(0x33, 0x34), + regmap_reg_range(0x37, 0x37), + regmap_reg_range(0x3B, 0x3C), + regmap_reg_range(0x40, 0x41), + regmap_reg_range(0x43, 0x44), + regmap_reg_range(0x47, 0x49), + regmap_reg_range(0x4B, 0x4C), + regmap_reg_range(0x4E, 0xAF), + regmap_reg_range(0xB1, 0xB3), + regmap_reg_range(0xB5, 0xB7), + regmap_reg_range(0xBF, 0xD0), + regmap_reg_range(0xDB, 0xDB), + regmap_reg_range(0xE0, 0x17F), + { } +}; + +static const struct regmap_access_table max1721x_regs = { + .yes_ranges = max1721x_regs_allow, + .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(max1721x_regs_allow), + .no_ranges = max1721x_regs_deny, + .n_no_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(max1721x_regs_deny), +};It should be enough to specify the yes_range. Unspecified values will be no implicitly.I can remove this. I just desribe all registers hole described in datasheet. I hope this reduce memory in regmap infrastructure.
That's what I suspected.
quoted
quoted
+/* W1 regmap config */ +static const struct regmap_config max1721x_regmap_w1_config = { + .reg_bits = 16, + .val_bits = 16, + .volatile_table = &max1721x_regs, + .max_register = MAX1721X_MAX_REG_NR, +};Are the non-volatile registers missing? Then you probably also want to specify .rd_table with the same access table, so that dumping registers via debugfs work correctly. Did you try to cat /sys/kernel/debug/regmap/<your-device>/registers?Ok, I try this. Non-volatile registers present (Rsense, manufaturer, device name, serial number). I not read this register until probe step, so I not put them into nonvolatile regmap table. But I can do this. May be it's more correctly, than desribe registers hole.
Register hole table should be used for the rd_table. You can skip configuration of the volatile_table, if you do not enable caching via max1721x_regmap_w1_config.cache_type. Enabling the caching is only sensible, if you do not mark all registers as volatile ;)
quoted
quoted
+ +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); +MODULE_AUTHOR("Alex A. Mihaylov [off-list ref]"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Maxim MAX17211/MAX17215 Fuel Gauage IC driver"); +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:max1721x-battery");Otherwise looks good.BTW. I try send RFC with alternative realisation of this driver into linux-pm: [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=149422406914440 [2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=149422407014444
Ah I skipped this one, since there was a newer revision. Yes, this is what I had in mind when I talked about merging the w1 driver into the power-supply driver.
This code maped to thermal zones, not used platform device and put max172xx-battery.h into include/linux/power. All know troubel in [1].
So here are answers to your questions
1. Endian for W1-regmap Code writen for use nativ endian for host (master) device. But waiting for little-endian slave divice. I don't know W1 slave device with big-endian addrees or data format. May be regmap_bus or regmap_config will be checked for host/device endian requirements?
regmap_bus.reg_format_endian_default provides a default endianess for the bus, which can be overwritten via regmap_config.val_format_endian. Since Mark queued your patch everything seems to be alright (I did not review it).
2. W1 Family/device infrastructure All present power_supply class drivers in vanilla kernel use w1-slave devices. All of them create platform_device with name "chip-battery.X.auto", and power_supply class driver use this platform device. Why used this way? I write code, allocated power_supply at W1 slave (family) device register. This work as expected.
Historical reasons. The patch [0], which I already mentioned is the first step to move bq27xxx w1 driver into the power-supply subsystem.
3. Device names All W1 device have unical 64 bit ID (8-bit family, 48-bit serial number, 8 bit CRC). W1 infrastructure show 56 bits (family-serial_nimber) as w1 slave device name. I use this (unical) device name as power_supply battery name. This work. But in /sys/class/power_supply is placed machine readabe subdir "26-HexDigString", instead of human-readable "chip-battery.X.auto". But in /sys/class/power_supply/26-HexDigString/type file still content human-readable type "Battery". Thermal zone working, but in /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zoneX/type also placed "26-HexDigString", instead of "chip-battery.X.auto". I can rename "26-HexDigString" to "battery-26-HexDigString" or "26-HexDigString-battery", but this exceeded 20 chars thermal zone device name. So, thermal zone will have to be disabled.
I think max1721x-<serial> would be better. If the name is too long, just disable the thermal zone for now. We have more w1/psy drivers, that have problems due to the thermal zone device name length limitation. [0] https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2524566.html -- Sebastian
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 833 bytes