Re: [PATCH 0/6] ACPI / PM: Suspend-to-idle rework to deal with spurious ACPI wakeups
From: Hans de Goede <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-08 07:24:47
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-pci, lkml
From: Hans de Goede <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-08 07:24:47
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-pci, lkml
Hi, On 08-06-17 02:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi All, This series is a replacement for commit eed4d47efe95 (ACPI / sleep: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idle) which is still there in 4.12-rc4 but will be reverted shortly, because it triggered issues on quite a few systems. The last patch in the series is a counterpart of the above commit with a few modifications, mostly to avoid affecting suspend-to-RAM and to reorder messages printed to kernel logs to make them somewhat less confusing. The previous patches are pre-requisite changes plus some cleanups. The major ones are [1-2/6] and [4/6] that are really needed for things to work as expected after [6/6]. In addition to that, this patch from Hans: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9762815/ is needed for USB wakeup on Bay Trail and Cherry Trail systems to work in general.
Small correction, that patch currently only influences Cherry Trail devices, it has:
static const struct x86_cpu_id int0002_cpu_ids[] = {
/*
* Limit ourselves to Cherry Trail for now, until testing shows we
* need to handle the INT0002 device on Baytrail too.
* ICPU(INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_SILVERMONT1), * Valleyview, Bay Trail *
*/
ICPU(INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_AIRMONT), /* Braswell, Cherry Trail */
{}
};
If anyone sees any issues where the SCI (typically irq 9) gets a nobody
cared message on Bay Trail try the linked patch with the Bay Trail line
above uncommented.
Regards,
Hans