On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:52 AM, Sebastian Reichel [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 03:09:21PM -0700, Liam Breck wrote:
quoted
From: Liam Breck <redacted>
Not for upstream.
Obviously.
quoted
Temporary workaround to prevent bq24190-battery device
from interfering with a fuel gauge that has .type=power_supply_type_battery
I'll move properties from -battery device to -charger in a subsequent version.
I thought about the transistor, which can take the battery
offline and IMHO it should be exposed as regulator.
That still leaves the health status reading, though. From
userspace's point-of-view this should be merged into the
battery device, if fuel-gauge can't provide that information.
You mean merged into the -charger device? -battery is the one we're dropping.
If you did mean -battery, could you elaborate?