Re: [PATCH v1] power: supply: bq25890: Use gpiod_get()
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2017-02-28 15:14:11
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 19:12 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
Since index is always 0, replace gpiod_get_index() by gpiod_get().
Any comments on this? I would reduce as much as possible use of gpiod_get_index*() to sort out things later.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/power/supply/bq25890_charger.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/bq25890_charger.cb/drivers/power/supply/bq25890_charger.c index f993a55cde20..8e2c41ded171 100644--- a/drivers/power/supply/bq25890_charger.c +++ b/drivers/power/supply/bq25890_charger.c@@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ static int bq25890_irq_probe(struct bq25890_device*bq) { struct gpio_desc *irq; - irq = devm_gpiod_get_index(bq->dev, BQ25890_IRQ_PIN, 0, GPIOD_IN); + irq = devm_gpiod_get(bq->dev, BQ25890_IRQ_PIN, GPIOD_IN); if (IS_ERR(irq)) { dev_err(bq->dev, "Could not probe irq pin.\n"); return PTR_ERR(irq);
-- Andy Shevchenko [off-list ref] Intel Finland Oy