On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Josh Poimboeuf [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 04:41:09PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
quoted
On 12/01/2016 11:31 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
quoted
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S
index 169963f..1df9b75 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S
@@ -109,6 +109,22 @@ ENTRY(do_suspend_lowlevel)
movq pt_regs_r14(%rax), %r14
movq pt_regs_r15(%rax), %r15
+#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
+ /*
+ * The suspend path may have poisoned some areas deeper in the stack,
+ * which we now need to unpoison.
+ *
+ * We can't call kasan_unpoison_task_stack_below() because it uses %gs
+ * for 'current', which hasn't been set up yet. Instead, calculate the
+ * stack range manually and call kasan_unpoison_shadow().
+ */
+ movq %rsp, %rdi
+ andq $CURRENT_MASK, %rdi
+ movq %rsp, %rsi
+ xorq %rdi, %rsi
+ call kasan_unpoison_shadow
+#endif
+
Looks good, but in fact we can use kasan_unpoison_task_stack_below(). We just need to change it a little:
diff --git a/mm/kasan/kasan.c b/mm/kasan/kasan.c
index 70c0097..e779236 100644
--- a/mm/kasan/kasan.c
+++ b/mm/kasan/kasan.c
@@ -80,7 +80,9 @@ void kasan_unpoison_task_stack(struct task_struct *task)
/* Unpoison the stack for the current task beyond a watermark sp value. */
asmlinkage void kasan_unpoison_task_stack_below(const void *watermark)
{
- __kasan_unpoison_stack(current, watermark);
+ void *base = (void *)((unsigned long)watermark & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1));
+
+ kasan_unpoison_shadow(base, watermark - base);
}
With this we don't have to calculate stack range in assembly.
That is better indeed, will do a v3.
agree