On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Ingo Molnar [off-list ref] wrote:

* Viresh Kumar [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

This patch rectifies a comment present in sugov_irq_work() function to
follow proper grammar.

Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 42a220e78f00..71e1a980d40a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c

@@ -315,15 +315,15 @@ static void sugov_irq_work(struct irq_work *irq_work)
      sg_policy = container_of(irq_work, struct sugov_policy, irq_work);

      /*
+      * For Real Time and Deadline tasks, the schedutil governor shoots the
+      * frequency to maximum. Special care must be taken to ensure that this
+      * kthread doesn't result in the same behavior.
       *
       * This is (mostly) guaranteed by the work_in_progress flag. The flag is
+      * updated only at the end of the sugov_work() function and before that
+      * the schedutil governor rejects all other frequency scaling requests.
       *
+      * There is a very rare case though, where the RT thread yields right
       * after the work_in_progress flag is cleared. The effects of that are
       * neglected for now.
       */

Also:

  s/Real Time task/RT task
  s/Deadline task/deadline task

With those:

  Acked-by: Ingo Molnar [off-list ref]

Fixed up and applied.

Thanks,
Rafael