Re: [PATCH v6 4/8] usb: core: add power sequence handling for USB devices
From: Peter Chen <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-23 03:20:28
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, lkml
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:09:54PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
quoted
quoted
+ +static int hub_of_pwrseq_on(struct device_node *np, struct usb_hub *hub) +{ + struct pwrseq *pwrseq; + struct usb_pwrseq_node *pwrseq_node; + int ret; + + pwrseq = pwrseq_alloc_generic(); + if (IS_ERR(pwrseq)) + return PTR_ERR(pwrseq); + + ret = pwrseq_get(np, pwrseq); + if (ret) + goto pwr_free; + + ret = pwrseq_on(np, pwrseq); + if (ret) + goto pwr_put; + + pwrseq_node = kzalloc(sizeof(*pwrseq_node), GFP_KERNEL);You need to check that the kzalloc succeeded.
Ok.
quoted
quoted
+ pwrseq_node->pwrseq = pwrseq; + list_add(&pwrseq_node->list, &hub->pwrseq_on_list); + + return 0; + +pwr_put: + pwrseq_put(pwrseq); +pwr_free: + pwrseq_free(pwrseq); + return ret; +}This subroutine looks very generic. The only place where it cares that it was called for a USB hub is the list_add(), and that could easily become generic also (make this function take &hub->pwrseq_on_list as its second argument, instead of hub). It looks like this routine really belongs in the power sequence library.
I will export below two generic functions at pwrseq library: int generic_pwrseq_on(struct device_node *np, struct list_head *head) void generic_pwrseq_off(struct list_head *head) delete this file, and call above APIs at hub.c.
quoted
quoted
+ +int hub_pwrseq_on(struct usb_hub *hub) +{The names of this routine and the subroutine above are too similar. After all, both functions require OF support.
I will add #ifdef CONFIG_OF for related code. And put the content at
hub_pwrseq_on at hub_probe directly, how about below?
hub_probe() {
...
if (hub_configure(hub, endpoint) >= 0) {
#ifdef CONFIG_OF
for_each_child_of_node(parent->of_node, np) {
ret = generic_pwrseq_on(np, hub);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
#else
return 0;
#endif
}
hub_disconnect(intf);
return ret;
}
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen