On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 07:12:21PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:

quoted

quoted

This is indeed a generic problem, as we don't have a way to describe
these kind of dependences between devices. In other words, we need to
control the order of how devices becomes suspended/resumed. If that
could be done, we could likely avoid runtime resuming devices
unnecessarily.

Correct, keep me in the loop and I can test some patches.

So, this patch is discarded in favor of a generic solution?

Yes?