Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ARM64: kernel: PSCI: move PSCI idle management code to drivers/firmware
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-06 16:55:45
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 01:34:47PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 01:27:01PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 12:51:42PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:quoted
On ARM, that option is CONFIG_ARM_CPU_SUSPEND - that option solely controls whether cpu_suspend/resume are present. ARM64 just needs to adopt this, and use that to control the code which is built in drivers/firmware/psci.c. However, I don't think it's as simple as just adding that to ARM64, as you need to be careful of the Kconfig dependencies. For ARM, this is: Generic code: - SUSPEND defaults to y, depends on ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE (which is set for any cpu_suspend enabled CPU.) - PM_SLEEP if SUSPEND || HIBERNATE_CALLBACKS ARM sets: - CPU_PM if SUSPEND || CPU_IDLE. - ARM_CPU_SUSPEND if PM_SLEEP || BL_SWITCHER || (ARCH_PXA && PM) What this means is that CPU_PM is entirely independent of ARM_CPU_SUSPEND. One does not imply the other, so I think you need to consider carefully what ifdef you need in drivers/firmware/psci.c. This is why I think fixing this is not simple as it first looks.Not saying it is nice, but unless I find a cleaner way I was keener on adding a silent config entry in drivers/firmware, say: config ARM_PSCI_CPU_IDLE def_bool ARM_PSCI_FW && CPU_IDLE select ARM_CPU_SUSPEND if ARM and use that to either guard the code or stub it out and compile it if that config option is enabled.That immediately worries me, because it bypasses the CPU dependencies for ARM_CPU_SUSPEND implicitly applied via ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE. I'd prefer instead: config ARM_PSCI_CPU_IDLE def_bool ARM_PSCI_FW && CPU_IDLE && (!ARM || ARM_CPU_SUSPEND)
If you are not against it, I could make ARM_PSCI select ARM_CPU_SUSPEND, the CPU dependency would be taken into account (ie CPU_V7) and this would mirror what's done for the eg BL_SWITCHER. This would remove the need for ARM_PSCI_CPU_IDLE above altogether and I could guard the code in drivers/firmware/psci.c through CONFIG_CPU_IDLE. It is just an option, please let me know. Thanks, Lorenzo