Hi Punit,

On 09/28/2015 09:48 AM, Punit Agrawal wrote:

Hi Mike,

I ran into an issue when using this patch. Posting it here as this is
the latest posting I can find.

Morten Rasmussen [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

From: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>

...

quoted

diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 1f2c9a1..30241c9 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h

@@ -494,6 +494,9 @@ extern struct cpufreq_governor cpufreq_gov_ondemand;
 #elif defined(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_CONSERVATIVE)
 extern struct cpufreq_governor cpufreq_gov_conservative;
 #define CPUFREQ_DEFAULT_GOVERNOR	(&cpufreq_gov_conservative)
+#elif defined(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_SCHED_GOV)
+extern struct cpufreq_governor cpufreq_gov_sched_gov;
+#define CPUFREQ_DEFAULT_GOVERNOR	(&cpufreq_gov_sched)
 #endif

You have extra 'gov' in CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_SCHED_GOV and
cpufreq_gov_sched_gov above.

Thanks, this was pointed out earlier and will be fixed in subsequent
revisions of the patchset.