Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] cpufreq: introduce cpufreq_driver_might_sleep
From: Felipe Balbi <hidden>
Date: 2015-06-29 16:40:40
Also in:
lkml
Hi, On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 09:26:21AM -0700, Michael Turquette wrote:
Quoting Felipe Balbi (2015-06-26 17:48:31)quoted
Hi, On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 04:53:42PM -0700, Michael Turquette wrote:quoted
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 28e59a4..e5296c0 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c@@ -112,6 +112,12 @@ bool have_governor_per_policy(void) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(have_governor_per_policy); +bool cpufreq_driver_might_sleep(void) +{ + return !(cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_DRIVER_WILL_NOT_SLEEP); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_driver_might_sleep); + struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { if (have_governor_per_policy())diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h index 2ee4888..1f2c9a1 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h@@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ u64 get_cpu_idle_time(unsigned int cpu, u64 *wall, int io_busy); int cpufreq_get_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu); int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu); bool have_governor_per_policy(void); +bool cpufreq_driver_might_sleep(void); struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy); #else static inline unsigned int cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)@@ -314,6 +315,14 @@ struct cpufreq_driver { */ #define CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK (1 << 5) +/* + * Set by drivers that will never block or sleep during their frequency + * transition. Used to indicate when it is safe to call cpufreq_driver_target + * from non-interruptable context. Drivers must opt-in to this flag, as the + * safe default is that they might sleep. + */ +#define CPUFREQ_DRIVER_WILL_NOT_SLEEP (1 << 6)don't you need to update current drivers and pass this flag where necessary ?Felipe, Thanks for the review. Setting the flag can be done, but it is an opt-in feature. First, none of the legacy cpufreq governors would actually make use of this flag. Everything they do is in process context. The first potential user of it is in patch #3. Secondly, the governor in patch #3 will work without this flag set for a cpufreq driver. It will just defer the dvfs transition to a kthread instead of performing it in the hot path of the scheduler. Finally, the only hardware I am aware of that can make use of this flag is Intel hardware. I know nothing about it and am happy for someone more knowledgeable than myself submit a patch enabling this flag for that architecture.
the follow-up question would be: then why introduce the flag at all ? :-p -- balbi
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 819 bytes