On Monday, May 25, 2015 12:51:14 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:

On 23-05-15, 10:36, Shailendra Verma wrote:

quoted

Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <redacted>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c b/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c
index 1d723dc..3488c9c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c

@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ module_param(max_duration, int, 0444);
 
 
 /**
- * we can detect a core multipiler from dir0_lsb
+ * we can detect a core multiplier from dir0_lsb
  * from GX1 datasheet p.56,
  *	MULT[3:0]:
  *	0000 = SYSCLK multiplied by 4 (test only)

@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ static int cpufreq_gx_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 
 	/* it needs to be assured that at least one supported frequency is
 	 * within policy->min and policy->max. If it is not, policy->max
-	 * needs to be increased until one freuqency is supported.
+	 * needs to be increased until one frequency is supported.
 	 * policy->min may not be decreased, though. This way we guarantee a
 	 * specific processing capacity.
 	 */

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Queued up for 4.2, thanks!


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.