Re: [PATCH] cpufreq:cpufreq - Fix typo in comment.
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
Date: 2015-05-22 01:06:59
Also in:
lkml
On Thursday, May 21, 2015 11:47:51 PM Shailendra Verma wrote:
Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <redacted>
Two typos in two comments really. Care to fix the subject?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 8ae655c..b4c7e0f 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ int cpufreq_generic_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = transition_latency; /* - * The driver only supports the SMP configuartion where all processors + * The driver only supports the SMP configuration where all processors * share the clock and voltage and clock. */ cpumask_setall(policy->cpus);@@ -1891,7 +1891,7 @@ static int __target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, * Failed after setting to intermediate freq? Driver should have * reverted back to initial frequency and so should we. Check * here for intermediate_freq instead of get_intermediate, in - * case we have't switched to intermediate freq at all. + * case we haven't switched to intermediate freq at all. */ if (unlikely(retval && intermediate_freq)) { freqs.old = intermediate_freq;
-- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.