Re: [PATCH 00/14] cpufreq: resource management in preparation for module build
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2015-02-03 04:05:02
On 3 February 2015 at 02:28, Eduardo Valentin [off-list ref] wrote:
Dear all, The exynos cpufreq driver needs to be build as module. The need is to fix the problem risen by Arnd due to the added OF thermal dependency [1]. Therefore, this series, in preparation to allow building this driver as a module, changes the way this driver handles allocated resources. Now it is expected to free the allocated resources uppon driver exit. A couple of changes in the data structure organization and callbacks were necessary. Therefore, changes were added accordingly. Please review. I do not have a way to test these patch in a board today though. So, testing is more than welcome :-). [1] - https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/31/175 Cheers, Eduardo Valentin (14): cpufreq: exynos4210: properly put of node cpufreq: exynos4210: iounmap in error path cpufreq: exynos4210: use devm_clk_get cpufreq: exynos4x12: properly put of node cpufreq: exynos4x12: iounmap in error path cpufreq: exynos4x12: use devm_clk_get cpufreq: exynos5250: properly put of node cpufreq: exynos5250: iounmap in error path cpufreq: exynos5250: use devm_clk_get cpufreq: exynox-cpufreq: pass exynos_dvfs_info to .set_freq callback cpufreq: exynos4210: remove unused symbol cpufreq cpufreq: exynos4x12: remove unused symbol cpufreq cpufreq: exynos5250: remove unused symbol cpufreq cpufreq: exynos-cpufreq: release resources by using managed allocation
Some of this might be unnecessary .. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-November/304984.html And please cc samsung maintainers next time ..